CivicMedia/Minnesota Archive

Here you can find a listing of all shows ...

Monday, May 14, 2012

PLEASE HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NOTE: For those who heard us mention the videotaping of this edition during the show, the finished video should be available soon. We'll let you know as soon as it is. We're working our way back to reguolar video produciton of TTT, both live and recorded. Thanks for your patience.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Something about the violence that occurs behind the doors of family homes has made it untouchable in our culture. The rage born of violence inflicted in the heat of arguments over money and power, usually fueled by drugs and alcohol, may have its roots in the sense of powerlessness arising from relentless unemployment or underemployment, from oppression outside the home, or from mental illness of one kind or another. Shifting such a cultural taboo from a blind eye to interventions and community responsibility has been a tough journey for women’s and children’s advocates.

One of the issues confronting them here and everywhere is the fact that most mainstream – and, certainly, the commercial media in most communities, steadfastly underreport the very real statistics surrounding societal ills as racism, poverty, discrimination, environmental injustice – and, especially, domestic violence. Wives. Mothers. Children. And some men, although rare. All face the threat of violence under conditions far too common for so-called civilized society.

Is it in the best interests of these media to underreport – or fail to report – or simply ignore these persistent social maladies because the subject makes their listeners and viewers squirm with a sense that we can do little about the treatment of women, children, and, yes, other kinds of partners? Perhaps. Making people uncomfortable can be seen as driving audiences away from their lucrative programs – so let us simply entertain – even when more honesty in their newscasts would be performing a real service.

But, another dynamic may be at work here: Domestic troubles are not seen by many as the purview of the public, even though, under any other circumstances, the sort of abuse and assault that occurs in those settings is no different from any other violence and no less subject to prosecution and conviction as very real crimes against persons.

Many still see this as between couples and their kids – as happening in some sort of sanctum sanctorum – that untouchable place for outsiders, no matter how violent – including the death(s) of (usually) the woman and/or child. And the deaths – and violence – just keep on coming…despite laws passed in most states – relatively recently – mandating law enforcement intervention even when victims change their minds about arresting and/or prosecuting their partners.

But, for women’s advocates, reauthorizing the national Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has been like pulling teeth, with most Republicans refusing to vote for it. Many Senate Republicans did vote for it, so it passed out of the Senate in April. But the House and its Republican majority has thus far refused to do so, and women’s groups oppose the House version of the bill (HR4970) because it specifically excludes from coverage Native women and gays.

But the numbers simply do not lie (statistics herewith combine federal and state data):

Every 9 seconds in the US a woman is assaulted or beaten. An estimated 1.3 million women are victims of physical assault by an intimate partner each year.3 Existing law denies Native women equal access to justice, which is borne out by statistic after statistic: 34% of American Indian and Alaska Native women will be raped in their lifetimes; 39% will be subjected to domestic violence in their lifetimes; and on some reservations, Native women are murdered at more than ten times the national average.

Around the world, at least one in every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused during her lifetime. Most often, the abuser is a member of her own family. One in every four women will experience domestic violence in her lifetime.1 One in 33 men have experienced an attempted or completed rape. 2,542 forcible rapes were known or reported in Minnesota in 2006.10

Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women—more than car accidents, muggings, and rapes combined. Every day in the US, more than three women are murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. At least 20 Minnesota women were murdered as a result of domestic violence in 2006.11

Studies suggest that up to 10 million children witness some form of domestic violence annually. Men who as children witnessed their parents’ domestic violence were twice as likely to abuse their own wives than sons of nonviolent parents.

At least 12 children were killed in Minnesota as a result of domestic violence or child abuse in 2006.11   37,010 women and children in Minnesota were served by battered women community advocacy programs in 2006.11 In 2006:11

_ 5,295 battered women and 5,131 children used Minnesota emergency shelter services.

    _ 434 battered women and 535 children used emergency motel-hotel housing.

Nearly 1 in 5 teenage girls who have been in a relationship said a boyfriend threatened violence or self-harm if presented with a breakup.

Ninety-two percent of women surveyed listed reducing domestic violence and sexual assault as their top concern.

Domestic violence victims lose nearly 8 million days of paid work per year in the US alone—the equivalent of 32,000 full-time jobs.

Based on reports from 10 countries, between 55 percent and 95 percent of women who had been physically abused by their partners had never contacted non-governmental organizations, shelters, or the police for help.

The costs of intimate partner violence in the US alone exceed $5.8 billion per year: $4.1 billion are for direct medical and health care services, while productivity losses account for nearly $1.8 billion.

And on and on. There are more, but these are too much to take in all at once, anyway.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI talk with a few of the professionals who spend or have spent whole careers trying to mitigate all this household and family terror.

GUESTS:

REP. MICHAEL PAYMAR – Career Manager of Domestic Abuse program for Law Enforcement personnel; Coordinator of Community Responses to Domestic Abuse by key players; Counselor to men who batter

JOANNE SEABERG – Retired Domestic Abuse Counselor; formerly Lead Program Coordinator, Fairview Domestic Abuse Services (formerly WomanKind); Former Women’s Advocate, B. Robert Lewis House, Eagan

CARRIE LINK, MD – Family Physician, University of Minnesota Hospitals-Smiley’s Clinic, Minneapolis; Teacher in Family Medicine, University of MN; Former Fairview Domestic Abuse Services (formerly WomanKind) Advocate

CORY CHENEVERT: Social Worker, Expert in Child Protection Assessment, & Family Intake Screening and Child Welfare Intervention for a Metro Twin Cities County Human Services Department.

Monday, May 7, 2012

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s tough to tout a program that places such a premium on volunteerism and/or minimal recompense for work often required of certified teachers, but this week, we talk about this very program of using young people help kids get into and out of higher education and working out of several youth oriented non profits as well as the public schools.

We hear quite a bit, on and off, about the AmeriCorps program, which has its roots in the original VISTA – Volunteers in Service to America – program – a sort of Peace Corps for the domestic side – right here in US cities and communities.

In St. Paul alone, some 21 local groups deploy AmeriCorps/VISTA members to help fulfill various missions – most of them directly involving young people. The City of St. Paul has an AmeriCorps coordinator heading up an effort to assist in what the City calls its commitment to education –

  1. Improve the quality and depth of learning opportunities available to youth in Saint Paul, and
  2. Increase access to high-quality learning opportunities for all Saint Paul children, especially at-risk and vulnerable youth.

There seem to be so many young people needing just that sort of thing, and one of the major helps they need is that of college attainment. Often, it seems, an extra push or some extra counseling or some success in testing is the difference between getting into college and simply making it through high school.

One of the organizations supplying such assistance is College Possible (formerly Admission Possible), and it uses copious quantities of AmeriCorps members in counseling high school students in reaching for what might otherwise be an elusive entrée into higher education.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI query some of the people behind these efforts in St. Paul and elsewhere about the benefits, challenges and policy implications of putting AmeriCorps volunteers (actually paid stipends for a year’s service), often themselves recent college graduates, in the schools and other community organizations to help kids move into colleges and careers.

GUESTS:

SARA DZIUK – Executive Director, College Possible–Twin Cities

WILLIAM TULLY – AmeriCorps Manager in the St. Paul Mayor’s Office

FATIMA OMAR – College Possible graduate, now an AmeriCorps member working for College Possible

Monday, April 30, 2012

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The baffling thing about poverty, like other societal maladies, apparently, is that, despite the dry, old statistics showing incredible increases in poverty, the decline in median incomes, the rise in homelessness and the decline in public assistance, the increase in foreclosures and the plunge in property values – the gap widens – and the people in power really don’t seem to give a damn.

What is it going to take – a complete collapse (as if we’re not already witnessing one) of our economic infrastructure before middle-class suburbanites take up arms against The Man and find themselves in the same place as the poor and people of color have been for decades – on the business end of a police officer’s 9mm Glock or Billy-club, a pepper-spray can or tear-gas canister for their trouble?

Perhaps. Then again, perhaps, that will be the only time a march on the banks and politicians will yield some results and policies will change and wealth will be shared.

But, leave us not hold our breath.

Average citizens/residents are feeling the pinch created by people and institutions who literally could care less – because they seem to have no depths to their lack of caring.

Poverty is NOT one of those conditions that will get better by the pulling up of bootstraps. Poverty is a societal disease that needs a major injection and infusion of capital – real capital – money and other resources. Anything else is a punishment inflicted on people who have less than the people making the decisions and who spend much of their legislative or administrative time and capital denying others their fair share of a pie they keep shrinking.

How bad is it?

Cynthia Boyd of MinnPost.com wrote last Fall:

Nationally, the poverty rate is 15.1 percent, while Minnesota ranks 13th lowest in the nation in numbers of those living below the poverty line ($11,344 for an individual or $22,113 household income for a family of four), but the state's numbers have increased significantly from 2007-2008. The poverty rate then was 9.6 percent.  

The effects play out in the state in concrete ways. Human Services Commissioner Lucinda Jesson told MinnPost last month that 104,000 more Minnesotans have signed on for food support this year compared to last.

And a September 2011 Minnesota Budget Project report comes this:

In 2009-2010, 560,000 Minnesotans lived in poverty, or roughly one out of ten state residents. That represents a 2.1 percentage point increase from 2006-07. Nationwide, 46.2 million people were in poverty in 2010.

Even more staggering, the preliminary numbers show that over the last decade, Minnesota’s median household income fell from $65,120 in 1999-2000 to $54,785 in 2009-2010, or by more than $10,000, after adjusting for inflation. Only Michigan experienced a larger decline in median income during the same period.

And, should anyone believe this is limited to the Metro – where many believe all “those people” live – this from Robb Murray of the Mankato Free Press:

John Woodwick, executive director of the Minnesota Valley Action Council in Mankato, said the number of people in the nine-county area served by MVAC rose from 16,292 in 2000 to 26,233 in 2009, an increase of 61 percent.

During the same period, federal and state funding for MVAC’s (poverty-related) services has decreased 21 percent on a per-person basis. In 2000, MVAC received a total of $793 in federal and state funds for every person living in poverty in the south-central Minnesota service area. By 2009, funding had decreased to $627 per person, according to MVAC’s annual budgets.

“We haven’t seen lately the massive layoffs we’ve seen in the last two years, but the new hires aren’t happening either,” Woodwick said. “And many people haven’t been able to locate work, especially not at what their previous wages were.”

The once-reliable Minnesota, Metro and regional foundations have cut their humans services funding, sometimes by half, even as many nonprofits and advocacy groups came to believe philanthropy would fill the gaps political types either created or refused to fill.

This year’s legislative session almost made a complete disaster of its humans services bill(s), but escaped some of the worst cuts tendered for passage by Republican bill sponsors, perhaps in the face of sure vetoes by Governor Mark Dayton. But, this is all relative, is it not?

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI talk with just four of the many Minnesota advocates whose ulcer-ridden work continues to be a war against the disproportionate impact of rightwing politics and a struggling economy that gives the policymakers the excuse to cut further into the lives of the people they blame for being poor: the poor themselves.

GUESTS:

Katherine Wagoner, Executive Director, Affirmative Options Coalition

Angel Buechner -  Co-Chair, Welfare Rights Committee

Nancy Maeker - Executive Director, A Minnesota Without Poverty

ADDITIONAL STATS:

1 in 10 Minnesotans miss an average of 10 meals a month (that is 100 million missing meals every year).

1 in 4 women over 16 years of age is experiencing poverty in Minnesota

2010 food shelf visits in Minnesota: 3 million visits statewide.

37.2% of African Americans and 39.5% of American Indian Minnesotans are living in poverty.

599,000 individuals are experiencing poverty in Minnesota.(2010 US Census bureau)

A family of four living in greater Minnesota would need to make $12.56/hour per worker to meet basic needs.

Minnesota children living in poverty: 192,000 (15.2%) - this is a 62% increase since 2000.

Minnesota minimum wage is $6.15 an hour, the federal minimum wage is $7.25.

Number of homeless individuals in Minnesota: 13,100 on any given night (47% are age 5 and under).

Poverty rate among African Americans in Minnesota is the 3rd highest in the nation.

The 2011 Federal Poverty Guideline for a family of four is $22,350.

MORE RESOURCES:

Legislative Commission to End Poverty in Minnesota by 2020 (Final Report)

THE RICH AND THE REST OF US - by Dr. Cornel West & Tavis Smiley:

PBS talk show host Tavis Smiley said on "Face the Nation" Sunday that poverty in America "threatens our very democracy," and that it threatens our national security.

Smiley and Princeton Professor Cornel West, co-authors of the new book The Rich and the Rest of Us (Smiley Books), talked to host Bob Schieffer about how half of Americans - 150 million people - are poor, which they defined as living one or two paychecks away from poverty.

"There seems to be a bipartisan consensus in this town - and you know how hard that is to do - but a bipartisan consensus that the poor just don't matter, that poverty is just not an important issue," Smiley said. "We cannot abide another campaign for the White House where the issue of poverty isn't raised higher on the American agenda."

 

 

Monday, April 23, 2012

PLEASE HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I sometimes think that, for all the talk about race we think we’re hearing, that incidents involving clear human and civil rights infractions – whether individually perpetrated (physical and psychological violence), or institutionally perpetuated (segregation, employment discrimination, environmental injustice, voter suppression, economic and health disparities, housing discrimination and predatory lending) – are seen as essentially isolated occurrences and not the culturally and emotionally, therefore institutionally, manifestations of embedded sickness in a society whose history belies its founding principles embodied in the Declaration and Constitution and Bill of Rights. We are NOT facing race as a reality in this culture. We are NOT talking honestly about this leprosy of democracy – at least as much as we ignore the other pestilence destroying democracy: homeland security and the misuse of law enforcement to turn average citizens and journalists into criminals.

African-American folk, American Indians, Latinos, Asians – and now, with a vengeance, Arabic and Muslim citizens and immigrants – have all felt the sting of racial separation in all those categories, considered The Other in this country on so many levels, one wonders if we can recover from the parasites that infuse our rhetoric and official behavior such that the harm inflicted could be permanent.

It must be difficult, if not impossible, for majorities of our brethren and sisters of color to hold out hope for any sort of positive outcomes of any effort to work in concert with the white community and white-run institutions to bring honesty and open dialogue to the table to expose that embedded fear and loathing for its very real danger to our nation’s economic and political stability.

Not all answers can be covered by dialogue only, of course, but that’s where it must begin. Many groups in our communities of color – and, yes, among white folks as well – are taking a stab at such opportunities as present themselves for opening up the conversations necessary to start the ball rolling. But, the question remains – and we will ask it: after the discussion, what? What will participants do as next steps to move to outcomes that serve the communities in ways that bring very real change. How much is geography responsible for the continued isolation among such communities – in institutions – churches, schools, governments, companies and unions? Can we breach the physical segregation by breaching the psychological and emotional separation among peoples that share this larger space of ours?

Again this year, the evening following our show featuring some key presenters and awardees, the The Saint Paul Foundation’s Facing Race Initiative will present its awards to outstanding mentors of this notion of addressing race and its implications for their own and other communities. Last year’s Honorable Mention, author, filmmaker and Native language advocate, Dr. Anton  Treuer, will give this year’s keynoter. Old hands at combating racism, like Macalester Professor Emeritus Mahmoud El-Kati and Steve Pederson, an executive leadership team member with Diversity Resource Action Alliance up in Alexandria will be recognized as Ambassadors, along with Honorable Mentions emerging business inclusion coordinator Elizabeth A. Campbell for contractorsRyan Companies US, Inc.; Taneeza S. Islam, Esq., civil rights director, Center for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)-MN Chapter; and T. Gregory Stavrou, executive director of the Rochester Civic Theatre. The free program will be held at St. Paul’s Crowne Plaza Riverfront at Wabasha and Kellogg Blvd. starting at 6:00 PM, with hors d’oeuvres, program at 7:00.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI talk with key figures in this year’s Awards event.

GUESTS:

  DR. ANTON TREUER – Professor of Ojibwe, Bemidji State University; cultural preservationist working to restore the Ojibwe (Anishinaabe) language as a means of healing the wounds of racism; Author, Everything You Wanted to Know About Indians But Were Afraid to Ask, The Assassination of Hole in the Day and seven other books.

 TANEEZA ISLAM ­– Attorney and former Civil Rights Director, Center for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) -MN Chapter

 

 

  SHARON GOENS - Racial Equity Conversation Coordinator, Facing Race Initiative, The Saint Paul Foundation

 

 

Monday, April 16, 2012

 

 

 

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Earth Day is upon us again.

Most previous Earth Days have attempted – often quite successfully – to raise awareness of our individual responsibility to protect the environment, to protect the planet from global warming and other climate change issues, reducing the carbon in our lives – our air and water and atmosphere.

We’ve seen efforts at encouraging energy audits of our homes and businesses toward conserving energy and work us away from fossil fuel consumption and on to use of solar and wind alternatives on massive and neighborhood scales.

We’ve seen local community groups zero in on urban and community gardening as another way of achieving organic dominance over processed farming and foods.

What we have likely not spent enough time on is advocating for, nay, demanding, polluting corporations and governments to stop fouling the air and water in the most poverty-stricken of our neighborhoods and communities, invariably dominated by families and businesses of color. That’s the American Way – and it has ever been thus. It has and always be a matter of environmental justice.

Dating to the beginnings of the industrial revolution – the mid-19th Century – our cities’ and rural manufacturing might and energy production have been placed where they knew you’d find the least political power and organized resistance to the foul air and water created by their operations. This, of course, resulted in wide disparity in the health of families raised and reproduced in the shadow of those facilities pouring hundreds of killing chemicals into the essential elements of life: the air our children breathe and the water they need to survive and lead healthy lives.

Any wonder why there’s been a 600-700% increase in asthma rates among children over the last 30 years and an exacerbating rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among older people, who, for several generations were already on their way by smoking those oversold cigarettes. (Check out the maps - the industrial northeast has the highest rates of asthma.)

But these were often, nevertheless, the job-producers in many towns and cities. So, just as the mining initiatives and waste-burning facilities of today and yesterday hold the promise of employment, so did they more assuredly promise the highest of risks to the health of their workers and those community members and politicians who believed themselves tied to their success. They still do.

This year for Earth Day, we take on the subject of environmental justice and the manner in which official state, county and municipal government continue to ignore the effects of their environmentally dangerous decisions on their less-powerful constituents’ health and wellbeing and the will they lack to curtail the pollution destroying all of living matter in all of our rural and urban areas – in Minneapolis, currently, the Hennepin County garbage burner (HERC) and Northern Metals Recycling. We look, too, at the complicity of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) in either ignoring or actually aiding the permitting of such facilities to continue their deposits of dangerous chemicals into the air and/or waters of our urban and rural living venues.

Still, organizations concerned with our sustainability and safety are making some strides toward resolution at the community level as well as policy advocacy in lawmaking and rulemaking circles locally and statewide. An event celebrating the day and those efforts will be held on Earth Day itself, April 21st(22nd in some places), at the Urban League in North Minneapolis, Its organizers and speakers join us Monday morning.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI talk with several advocates taking our elected representatives and their corporate collaborators to task for the damage that never seems to end for those living in and around the worst of them.

GUESTS:

KAREN MONAHAN – Environmental Justice Community Organizer, Sierra Club North Star Chapter

LOUIS ALEMAYEHUEnvironmental Justice Advocates of Minnesota (EJAM) officer; Board member, North American Water Office; Writer, educator, activist, poet, father, grandfather of African and Native American heritage

SAM GRANT – Principal, Ujima Consulting and Movement Center for Deep Democracy; Founder and consultant with Full Circle Community Institute and Afro Eco

Monday, April 9, 2012

Remember – call and join the conversation – 612-341-0980 – or Tweet us @TTTAndyDriscoll or post on TruthToTell’s Facebook page.

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The complexity of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and food literally boggle the mind. The biochemistry involved in plant and animal genomics and transgenics – or the business of modifying the genes of any species – has turned ugly with growing resistance to the toying around with the genetic makeup of our crops and livestock and the rabid refusal of the genetic modifiers like Monsanto Chemical Company to label their foods – fighting with millions in lobbyist money all efforts by food safety experts, organic consumer advocates and respected groups like the Union of Concerned Scientists to pass state or federal legislation requiring the labeling of genetically modified foods.

That would seem a simple and responsible step toward gaining the confidence of consumers and such. Of course, no such foods could ever again be considered organic.

But what is the big deal?

Well of course, money for the inventers and sellers of chemicals that Monsanto and others peddle modified seeds to millions of farmers who see these additives as boosting yields and profits. But what is there to hide from a public that deserves to know what the hell they’re eating?

If they won’t say, then it can’t be good. Or can it? Well, we don’t know, do we?

The government seems clearly on the side of the modifiers. Its websites are loaded with terms that any wordsmith like this writer would see as advocacy for one point of view versus another – and the FDA’s and the USDA’s attempts at explanations are peppered with encouragement for accepting the benefits of genetic modification – both in pooh-poohing the safety issues (the evidence is never conclusive, is it, as to the harm GM foods might be causing) or in the dangers to the environment, animals and plants from all this playing around with biology.

But, woe to the organic farmer who tries to keep genetically modified seeds from blowing onto his property. If anything he grows shows signs of patented genes designed by Monsanto – never mind that nature did the stealing – the chemical company will sue. Hell, Monsanto has already scared off legislation in some states by threatening to sue of labeling requirements are passed.

This is the stuff of Orwellian tales – the willingness of a chemical firm to take some poor schlub to court over the infiltration of some other guys modified seeds into the crops next door even when he never wanted them in the first place – and getting the court to actually back the crushing by big brother corporations over this “mistake.”

The bigger deal is the total lack of control over the ethical use of GMOs by the public, especially the regulatory agencies and an apparent willingness to spend millions keeping it that way. Some international scientists are meting as we speak but not in the United States. No. These are mostly Asian and European scientists gathering in hand-wringing sessions and submitting scientific analyses about the need for keeping a keen eye on the ethics and biology of all this modifying of  plants and animals – even if the idea is to make them resistant to diseases and insects.

You wouldn’t believe the depth of research and discussion taking place over the entire field.

This is why this should be a very short hour given the amount of information available and the arguments flying back and forth over the rampant use of this chemical technology and the complete lack of understanding by an unwary public as to the short- and long-term ramifications of consuming the modified meats and vegetables so prevalent on our local food shelves these days.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI query three men immersed in this field and representing diverse perspectives on the farming and consumption of genetically modified organisms and foods and the impact of all of this on the ecology and legality of critical pollination.

GUESTS:

 DR. DAVID ANDOW – Entomologist; Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Insect Ecology, University of Minnesota; Coordinator of the International Project on GMO Environmental Risk Assessment Methodologies (GMO ERA Project)

GEORGE BOODY – Executive Director, Land Stewardship Project (LSP); MS in Horticulture and Human Nutrition; BS in Biology, University of Minnesota

RONNIE CUMMINS – Executive Director, Organic Consumers Association; former director, Jeremy Rifkin's Beyond Beef Campaign & Pure Food Campaign; author of books on Central American culture; co-author, Genetically-Engineered Foods: A Self-Defense Guide for Consumers

READ MORE ABOUT GMO’s HERE:

Genetically Modified Food - GM Foods List and Information

Millions Against Monsanto Minnesota

Agriculture Network Information Center (AgNIC)

U.S. Human Genome Project

Monday, April 2, 2012

He’s an unlikely radical. But his country’s hypocrisy, its lies about war and its clandestine destabilizing of democratically elected governments while propping up despots in others, when the conduct became as transparent as it did, drove Dick Bancroft round the bend back in the 1960s…and he’s seen no end of it in South America, in the Middle East, in Asia, Africa. This, after an affluent childhood in “old” St. Paul and an “iffy” education at the city’s primary private school – St. Paul Academy where his dyslexia contributed to less than stellar scholastics.

Bancroft has never wanted for the resources to support his family, but the resources that turn most affluent Americans into Republicans (he voted for Eisenhower in 1952) couldn’t prevent his radicalization after witnessing racism and exploitation in both his own and other countries. Where a few economic interests have enslaved the indigenous peoples of others, aided and abetted by the political class of the United States, controlled and manipulated by the economic aristocracy, Bancroft’s gift of chronicling and recording on film the history and historiography of the exploited classes everywhere put Bancroft front and center of international intrigue and domestic rebellion by our country’s own Natives – including the founding and fostering of the American Indian Movement (AIM).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stokely Carmichael, William Kunstler, Dennis Banks

Thus did Dick Bancroft and his wife, Debbie dedicate these last 50 years to fighting the barbarism and subversion of justice here and abroad through his camera lens and financial resources, hoping to expose the lies perpetrated by our governments in pursuit of profits and power across the prairie and around the globe.

 Dick Bancroft continues our look into the history and work of protest and dissent in Minnesota and its export elsewhere to expose the violence and hypocrisy of a country whose founding documents say one thing about liberty, justice, peace and equality while its history and official decisions contradict all of them, year after year, decade after decade. (Listen to last week’s conversation with Historian Rhoda Gilman and African-American change agents of the 60s, Rose Mary Freeman Massey and Melvin Giles.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rigoberta Menchú

Bancroft has rubbed shoulders and noses with Nobel laureatesGuatemalan Rigoberta Menchú and Ireland’s Mairead Corrigan Maguire, photographed them and been their friend. He has earned blood-brotherhood with the Ojibwe and Dakota peoples of Minnesota and the Upper Midwest with his work with AIM. And he has created a pictorial history of the joys and tragedies that accompany the lives of native peoples everywhere.

Here's a new addition: a 1970s photo of Dick Bancroft (with hair still dark) with L-R, Troubadour Larry Long (and still writing and singing), Painter Jan Attridge (another illustrator of nature and Native life in Minnesota and the Dakotas and still painting) and The Circle Native newspaper contributor, Mordecai Specktor (also Editor of the American Jewish World):

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI talk with Dick Bancroft, now nearly 85 years old, and reflect with him about the events that most marked his abandonment of his family’s political underpinnings and racial prejudices to create a world of peace and justice with Debbie and their children, which include polar explorer Anne Bancroft.

Dick will offer signed posters as membership premiums that feature his iconic photo of Rigoberta Menchú – symbol of Guatemala’s indigenous fight for independence and outspoken advocate for justice in the banana fields of her country.

 

 GUEST:

  RICHARD BANCROFT – Global Photographer; Peace Advocate

Monday, March 26, 2012

Remember – call and join the conversation – 612-341-0980 – or Tweet us @TTTAndyDriscoll or post on TruthToTell’s Facebook page.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WELCOME To WEEK ONE  of KFAI’s Spring Membership Drive. Please Support TruthToTell and our production Partner, KFAI. Call in your tax-deductible pledge: 612-375-9030!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The history of social activism in Minnesota is as much about protest as it is about advocacy. Social justice and protest are inextricably linked.

When it comes to legal dissent and embracing protest as political expression and free speech, official forces in the US and Minnesota have always resisted. When resistance meets resistance, when power resists those who speak to power, someone usually gets hurt. Such clashes date to the founding of all political entities everywhere – and Minnesota’s own history is rife and rich with the quest for justice, but recently – say, over the past 40-50 years of social and political upheaval – the forces of government have become more virulent, more dangerous in the name of homeland security and the so-called war on terror, than any previous periods, save those between the industrial giants and their exploited labor masses.

With every passing day, it seems, the government, even under Barak Obama, perhaps especially under this President, the Justice Department and local police forces keep stretching what they believe are justified intrusions into our private lives, not to mention our Constitutional right to publicly protest, to dissent from official policies maintaining our involvement in war and nation-building, in protecting despots over the people the rule. Thus do local and federal police forces now have the declared legal wherewithal to use any means necessary to quell such expression.

Those who have spent their lives or part of them standing up to these forces who would trample the rights of the rest of us to demand the elimination of discrimination, of racism, or the inequality of all humanity in every field of human endeavors are often praised in eulogies because they’ve died doing so.

Occasionally, some progress is claimed and rewarded with institutional change or with a cultural shift, slow as they all may be. Those still around to accept the kudos deserve them for their work as well as their survival.

The history of these phenomena is captured in a marvelous little volume by revered Minnesota Historian, Rhoda Gilman, one of the truly articulate chroniclers of Minnesota’s historical realities, including the definitive biography of Minnesota’s first state governor, Henry Sibley. Her latest book, Stand UP! The Story of Minnesota’ Protest Tradition, traces our conflicts beginning with the imposition on Minnesota’s Native peoples of the white man’s greed which itself came to a head during the Dakota Uprising 150 years ago this year, and takes us right up through the rise of the political right and the clashes in between.

Among the events demonstrating precisely the importance of protest was the 1969 takeover of the UofM’s Morrill Hall by African-American students. That upheaval led to the creation of the U’s first dedicated department – the African-American Studies Department, now the African-American and African Studies DepartmentMorrill Hall/Rachel Tilsen Social Justice Fund was established by alumni attending "We Still Have a Charge to Keep" events three years ago, the 40th Anniversary of V-DAY at Morrill Hall.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI put it to our guests how effective such work have been in altering the political and institutional landscape long considered uneven and unfair.

GUESTS:

RHODA GILMAN – Historian, retired from the Minnesota Historical Society; former Green Party candidate for Lieutenant Governor; Author, Stand UP! The Story of Minnesota’ Protest Tradition

ROSE MARY FREEMAN MASSEY – Original member and President, 1969 UofM Afro American Action Committee; co-founder with Dr. Horace Huntley of the Morrill Hall/Rachel Tilsen Social Justice Fund; Instructor, Milwaukee Area Technical College History Department.

MELVIN GILES – St. Paul Community activist, peace advocate, community gardener; One of the first two recipients of the Morrill Hall/Rachel Tilsen Social Justice Fund.

Monday, March 19, 2012

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Photo by Shekleton (Shekshots)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Are we becoming California by a back door? California law is peppered with voter-passed initiatives and referenda. Is this true democracy? Or a denigration of representative government?

The Minnesota Constitution does not allow what California’s does: passing and repealing state statutes by IR&R – Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Not that Republicans haven’t tried to install that device in the Constitution (current House File 2562, King Banaian [R-St. Cloud] would do just that), claiming that true democracy is when citizens vote directly for state laws, bypassing the Legislature. This would be 7th amendment offered up this year.

But to pass laws by popular vote right now, legislators can place them on the ballot only in the form of Constitutional amendments. (Referenda, or the repeal of existing state law, is not currently allowed at all. Recall of state office holders is allowed by a convoluted process involving the courts.)

So – this year and last – new but frustrated Republican majorities in both houses have found their rightwing agenda neutralized by the veto pen of DFL Governor Mark Dayton. In response they’re attempting to send their entire agenda to the ballot box – some bills already having been vetoed, others not. The issues already heading for the voters or possibly on the ballot thus far:

  1. The Marriage Amendment – defining marriage as between a man and a woman. Placed on this year’s November ballot last session. (Vice Pres. Walter Mondale and fmr Chief Justice Kathleen Blatz just announced their opposition to this.)
  2. Shoot First – Vetoed this session. So-called castle doctrine principle expanded to allow gun owners to shoot first much sooner – and ask questions later.
  3. Voter ID – Vetoed last session, now on the docket for passage to the November ballot. Requires a photo ID before voting – never mind the millions with no access to such identification.
  4. “Right-to-Work” – This may be floundering – but it would remove the requirement that a worker sign on to union membership in a union shop.
  5. Tax Bill Supermajorities – This may be on the back burner as well. Would require a two-thirds majority of the Legislature to vote in the affirmative for any tax bill to pass.

DFL Rep. Phyllis Kahn (Mpls) has answered with little-discussed bill of her own (HF2175 – companion S.F. No. 2017 [Pappas, et al]) to place on the ballot a question requiring a two-thirds majority of the Legislature to place any Constitutional amendment on the ballot. The theory, perhaps, being that, if the Constitutional amending process placing questions before the electorate continues to bypass any role for the Governor, then it should only be done so by a supermajority of its own. Looks like thus far Kahn’s bill may have languished, like Banaian’s, in the Government Operations and Elections Committee. No action is likely on those two with committee deadlines passing.

Just Friday, MPR's Tim Pugmire reported this on the question of this all perhaps backfiring: "....But Gov. Mark Dayton and other Democrats argue that many of those same voters are offended by the idea of lawmakers governing through the constitution. Dayton said the process not only bypasses him, but bypasses the intent of the state's founders who wanted the executive branch and legislative branch to work together.

DFL legislators insist that when they controlled the House and Senate they held back on using constitutional amendments to get around then-Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a Republican. They claim GOP leaders are now playing with fire. House Minority Leader Paul Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis, said the stage is now set for even more amendments down the road.

'If we start going down this path, it creates a very dangerous precedent," Thissen said. "At the end of the day, I think the fundamental principle is we've got to keep our constitution as limited and as sacred as possible, and it should be about expanding people's rights and not contracting them.'"

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI put it to our guests about individual and collective issues around the flood of Constitutional amendments this session and last – in search for answers about both the wisdom and strategy of piling amendments on the ballot in such a crucial election as this year’s – what with redistricting forcing legislators and Congressmen and women in new territories and a ballot full of offices from President and US Senate on down through judicial races and – yes, Constitutional amendments and, perhaps, even other local ballot questions.

GUESTS:

SUSIE BROWN – Public Policy DirectorMinnesota Council of Nonprofits

HEATHER MARTENS – President, Protect Minnesota

SHAR KNUTSON – President, MN AFL-CIO

Monday, March 12, 2012

HELP US BRING YOU THESE IMPORTANT DISCUSSIONS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST – PLEASE DONATE HERE!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Painting by Tom Slack "Main Street"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Those of who have lived around or near commercial areas in the core cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis for any length of time have noticed the incursion of chains into many of the spaces once occupied by businesses owned by your neighbor down the street or your fellow church or synagogue or mosque member, or by your brothers and sisters of the local lodges.

Those were the days we knew all of our business owners by their first names and they knew ours, no matter the frequency of our patronage. They just knew us – maybe because they’d known our parents and grandparents, or maybe we were their regulars. Boy, as a 12-year-old kid, I tried slipping a quick hand onto a shelf for a candy bar or a pair of nose plugs in our local drug store and the next thing I knew, the shop owner had me by the ear and never called the cops – he or she called my parents. That was no CVS, I’ll tell you. It was the Grandendale Drug and those guys were the best. (An art gallery now sits in that space.)

These people were like family. They weren’t in the business of faceless merchandising, they were in the business to serve and service their neighboring customers. No more in too many cases. Some of the in-town, neighborhood shopping strips like Hennepin Avenue, or Grand Ave. or Payne Avenue have evolved into a series of suburban mall-like stores with owners somewhere in California or New York and few of those relationships with owners and their pride and their workmanship and their locally based products and service operations have been able to survive under the weight of discounting or affordable merchandise and neighborly service.

Not all of them, mind you, but enough to know that the value of locally-owned and managed businesses, locally made goods or repair shops – and especially the healthier and more sustainable growers with their local fresh foods.

Buying local has become something of a mantra for a growing number of businesses. I don’t know whether that’s happening much in the suburbs, but a there seems to be a resurgence of home-grown businesses around here – and all across a country tired of faceless chains.

Keeping the local tradition alive and expanding it has been the business of the Metropolitan Independent Business Association or MetroIBA – emphasis on “Independent” – for a number of years now, and it, too, has its ups and downs. After all, I know how trying to herd a bunch of entrepreneurs into a single-minded organization can be tough duty. Most couldn’t be bothered because most were trying to survive as the independent types they usually are. But Metro IBA has clearly thrived – under some committed leadership and now, energetic management.

Just this past Wednesday, Stacy Mitchell of the Institute of Local Self Reliance New Rules Project, Author, Big-Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers and the Fight for America's Independent Businesses and Chair of the American Independent Business Alliance released her study called “Wal-Mart’s Greenwash” and put another nail in the coffin of chains and discounters for their attempts at heavily promoting sustainability initiatives that are falling substantially short. Said Mitchell: "Wal-Mart's sustainability campaign has done more to improve the company's image than to help the environment."

This is the antithesis of what would happen if most people would buy local – even when it might cost a few extra shekels.

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI spend an hour with a few of the always interesting characters that comprise the MetroIBA and the concept of localism.

GUESTS:

MARY HAMEL – Executive Director, MetroIBA

JEFF WARNER – President, Warners’ Stellian Appliance Stores in Minneapolis, St. Paul, MetroIBA President

JOHN HOESCHEN – Owner/Pharmacist, St. Paul Corner Drug, St. Paul